Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Hall

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1990No. 85050, (Calendar No. 11)Published

1DissentCavanagh, J.

Today, four members of this Court have whimsically and waywardly rendered purportless an historic, fundamental and perhaps, in the vast majority of criminal cases, the most significant stage in the criminal process. The clear message they today impart to police and prosecutors and the trial court judges of this state is this:

"Don’t worry if the evidence introduced at the preliminary examination is legally inadmissible or even if it is insufficient to warrant a bindover. As long as there is sufficient evidence to convict at the time of trial, this Court will ignore any pretrial error.”

Why do…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. People v. Pompa-OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Rogers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. DellabondaMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Myers v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API