Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Scott v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 22, 1985No. 502-84Published

1ConcurrenceClinton, Judge

The interpretation of “negotiated pleas of guilty” as used in the Dallas County Magistrates Act (“Act”), Article 1918c, V.A.C.S., applied by the Court in this cause and in Howard v. State, 690 S.W.2d 252 (Tex.Cr.App. delivered this day) seems still somewhat ambiguous and may need finer clarification — if not today, maybe tomorrow.1

Having made that observation, I would not write further but for the fact that the State interjected and the Dallas Court of Appeals alluded to Article 44.02, V.A.C.C.P. Scott v. State, 668 S.W.2d 430, 431-432 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1984), viz:

“It is true that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Howard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API