Legal Opinion

Brainard v. Ten Eyck

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1917Published

Action to recover balance alleged to be due under a building contract.

1Opinion of the CourtRudd, J.

The action was brought to recover the balance alleged to be due the plaintiff under a building contract. The amount claimed was $1,276.95.

The defendant alleges failure to perform and counterclaims damages by reason thereof of $1,000.

The contract price was $5,329. There have been made payments amounting to $4,140.80.

*22The balance alleged to be due is $1,189.20, to which are added extras amounting to $87.75, making the amount here sought by the plaintiff $1,276.95.

The jury rendered a verdict for plaintiff of $1,000.

The defendant moves to set aside the verdict on the ground that it is not in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Witt v. GilmourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API