Legal Opinion

Neddo v. Village of Ticonderoga

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Essex county. Action by Zoe Neddo against the village of Ticonderoga for personal injuries. From a judgment of nonsuit, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtHerrick, J.

The sidewalk on Lake George avenue, a street in the village of Ticonderoga, was a plank walk about 4 feet wide; and, at the point where the accident happened which gives rise *888to this action, a section of the said plank walk, some 13 or 14 feet in length, had been taken up, to enable wagons to cross, carrying stone and building materials for the erection of a building upon a lot in front of which the said plank walk fiad been removed. From the top of the sidewalk to the earth where the plank walk had been removed was a space of some eight or ten inches. The grade of the street at that point…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weston v. . City of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Wiwirowski v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. McDonald v. . Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scanlon v. City of WatertownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. Rogers v. City of RomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Crecelius v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API