Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Andrews v. Boyden

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

• Appeal from circuit court, Charles Mix county; Hon. E. G-. Smith, Judge. Mandamus by tbe state on the relation of T. E. Andrews against O. L. Boyden and others. Prom a judgment directing the issuance of a peremptory writ, defendants appeal. ■

1Opinion of the CourtHaney, J.

An amended alternative writ of mandamus having been issued by the circuit court commanding defendants Boyden, Campbell and Peters, as commissioners, the board of county commissioners, and Van Der Voort, as auditor of Charles Mix county, to at once amend the records of the January, 1904, session of the board, pertaining to a petition alleged to have been presented to the board relative to the location of the county seat in said county, “so as to show that on the 6th day of January, 1904, the said county board, after investigation of said petition of the relator and 1,525 others, did make and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Lindsay v. BoydenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mohr v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. State Ex Rel. Lovell v. TinsleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API