Legal Opinion

Succession of Waterer

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1873No. 3804PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the Parish Court, parish of Washington. Slocum, J.

1Opinion of the CourtTaliaferro, J.

The appellee moves to dismiss this appeal.

First — Because the certificate is defective in not reciting that the-transcript contains “all the documents filed in the suit,’’ and that it contains “all the testimony adduced.”

Second — That the transcript is signed by the deputy clerk.

Third, — That the record of appeal was not brought up within tlieproper time after the order for a certiorari was issued.

Fourth — That appellant is without interest in the suit.

*211The transcript is certified to be “a true copy of all the proceedings had and of all the testimony taken on the trial,” etc. This suffices. 12…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gorton v. Gorton'sSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1838

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Succession of AndrusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
  3. Succession of BarrLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API