Legal Opinion

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 13, 2010Published

1Per curiam

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by the First Department in 1990, was suspended by this Court’s order dated October 25, 2007 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 44 AD3d 1246 [2007]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that she has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-aAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API