Legal Opinion
Deloitte & Touche LLP v. Chiampou
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 22, 1995No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its *1027discretion in granting plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction to enforce the covenant not to compete in defendants’ partnership agreements (see, Gelder Med. Group v Webber, 41 NY2d 680; Karpinski v Ingrasci, 28 NY2d 45; Kindman & Co. v Stollar, 151 AD2d 393; Young & Co. v Black, 97 AD2d 369, appeal dismissed 61 NY2d 712). The court properly found that plaintiff had made a sufficient showing to warrant such relief. The court also…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Karpinski v. IngrasciNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Arthur Young & Co. v. BlackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Arthur Young & Co. v. BlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Jerry Kindman & Co. v. StollarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc. v. Warrior Fitness Boot Camp, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Inflight Newspapers, Inc. v. Magazines In-Flight, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- MARCONE APW, LLC v. SERVALL COMPANYAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Leon M. Reimer & Co., PC v. CipollaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- QBE Americas, Inc. v. AllenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.