Legal Opinion

Costigan & Co. v. Costigan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 24, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered April 11, 2002, which denied defendants’ motion for a default judgment on their counterclaim, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, defendants’ motion granted and the matter remanded for further proceedings.

Defendants’ motion for a default judgment was improperly denied by the IAS court since it relied on noncompliance with rule 24 (a) of the Rules of the Justices of the Commercial Division. That rule purports to bar a motion unless a prior conference has been held on the issue raised by the motion.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hochberg v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Lopez v. Trucking & Stratford, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barrett v. ToroyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Briarpatch Limited, L.P. v. Briarpatch Film Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Reyes v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
  4. Reyes v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API