Legal Opinion

Skidmore v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 10, 2006No. 01-CV-0026; A123598PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Defendants, the Clarks, appeal from a judgment of the trial court granting plaintiffs, the Skidmores, a prescriptive easement to roadways over the Clarks’ property. The Clarks assign error to the trial court’s determination that the Skidmores’ use of the roadways was adverse. On de novo review, Montagne v. Elliot, 193 Or App 639, 649, 92 P3d 731 (2004), we reverse.

The Skidmores and the Clarks are neighboring landowners of large rural properties in Jefferson County. The Clarks are the owners of Hay Creek Ranch, and the Skidmores are the owners of Parsley Homestead. Parsley Homestead lies…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Woods v. HartOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. House v. HagerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. R & C. RANCH, LLC v. KundeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. Hayward v. EllsworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. R & C RANCH, LLC v. KundeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Motes v. PacifiCorpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. Bridston v. Panther Crushing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. Wels v. HippeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API