Legal Opinion

Waddle v. Sutherland

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1930No. 28430PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

Appellant brought this action against appellee in the circuit court of Prentiss county, to recover damages for the loss of both his legs, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of appellee in treating appellant with an X-ray machine for eczema, a skin disease. There was a verdict and judgment for appellee, and from that judgment appellant prosecutes this appeal.

Appellant was suffering with an eczema. ' Appellee was a practicing physician and surgeon at Booneville, and in the practice of his profession used an X-ray machine for certain ailments. Appellee diagnosed appellant’s disease as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Lewis v. CasenburgTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Shockley v. TuckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Jones v. Tri-State Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. George v. ShannonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Latham v. HayesMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  2. DeLaughter v. WomackMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Sanders Et Ux. v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Harvey v. BorgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  5. Peerless Supply Co., Inc. v. JeterMississippi Supreme Court · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API