Indianapolis, Bloomington, & Western Railway Co. v. O'Reily

This suit was brohght to recover for work and labor done. The complaint is in two paragraphs, in the usual form. The first states that the work was done under a contract at an agreed price; and the second says that the work was done for the defendant, and that it was reasonably worth a certain sum.

The complaint is good in form and substance. The answer was the general denial only. There was a trial by jury, verdict for the plaintiff, and motion for new trial for these reasons: first, the verdict is contrary to law; second, the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence; third, the court…