Van Vlissingen v. Roth
Appellate Court of Illinois
Action of assumpsit. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Elbridge Hanecy, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1904.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman
This is an action in assumpsit upon a promissory note made by appellant payable to appellee for $2,500. At the conclusion ,of the plaintiff’s evidence, no evidence having been offered by the defense, the court directed the jury to return a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $3004.33, which was done.
The note hears an endorsement as follows: “Pay to the order of Luella Heinroth without recourse on me. Caroline Roth.” Appellant’s attorney urges that the court erred in admitting the note in evidence because there was no re-endorsement to appellee by Luella Heinroth. Hone was necessary. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Palmer v. GardinerIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Illinois Central Railroad v. SlaterIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Best v. Nokomis National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Prairie State Loan & Building Ass'n v. GorrieIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Bruson v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Waldock v. WinklerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915