In Re the Marriage of Van Regenmorter

Respondent-appellant Peter Van Regen-morter challenges the economic provisions of the dissolution decree dissolving his marriage to petitioner-appellee Carmen Van Regen-morter. Peter contends the provisions made by the district court are contrary to the parties’ prenuptial agreement and not justified when viewed in the context of the short-term marriage. We affirm as modified.

Carmen and Peter were married in 1991. The marriage, the second for both Carmen and Peter, was childless. Prior to the marriage, the parties executed a prenuptial agreement detailing each would maintain his or her…