Legal Opinion

Craddock v. O'Brien

California Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1894No. 18276PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yuba County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Haynes, C.

The defendant, in 1885, was the owner of certain judgments rendered by the superior court of Yuba county against “ Drainage District Number One, of the state of California” (which was organized under the act of April 23, 1880, entitled “An act to promote drainage ”), and made an agreement with the plaintiff, Craddock, whereby plaintiff undertook to collect them, and for which service, if successful, defendant agreed he should receive one thousand dollars. This agree*218ment, however, included another judgment in which defendant was not interested.

Plaintiff also received for collection…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Callahan v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gostin v. State Farm InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API