Legal Opinion

State v. Schwartz

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 17, 1976No. 57254PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Justice.

Defendants Robert M. Schwartz and Henry F. Jacomb filed a motion to set aside their arrest and annul their bond obligations. The basis of the motion was that the nonresidents were in this State in response to a federal subpoena to testify at a federal grand jury investigation, and were therefore exempt from arrest for matters which arose before the issuance of the summons. After a hearing the motion was denied, and we granted writs to consider the applicability of C.Cr.P. 743, the statute under which the defendants claim immunity from arrest.

Defendants were arrested under…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dwelle v. AllenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1912
  2. Gillan v. JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. BussaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  4. Forbess v. George Morgan Pontiac CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. People v. Aloi, New York County Courts1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coleman v. Bauerlein Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API