Vivian v. Board of Trustees of Colo. School of Mines
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
We will refer to plaintiffs in error as the respondents or by name, and to defendant in error as the Board or petitioner.
The action was commenced by the Board under the provisions of chapter 50, C.R.S. ’53 (the eminent domain statute) for the purpose of acquiring a parcel of real property owned by the Vivians. It had been leased by them to Otto and Myrtle Baltes for a term not as yet expired.
The acquisition sought by the Board was the full title to the property — there was to be no residue. Negotiations were commenced between petitioners and John C. Vivian (Chauncey H. Vivian being a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. McCaskill v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Denver Power & Irrigation Co. v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
- McClain v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
- Old Timers Baseball Ass'n v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
- Kistler v. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
3Cited by20 opinions
- Board of Assessment Appeals v. Colorado Arlberg ClubSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- City of Thornton v. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Ossman v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- United States v. 1.377 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. City of SterlingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.