Legal Opinion

Tanzer v. Bankers' Land & Mortgage Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 5, 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Bankers’ Land and Mortgage Corporation and others, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 11th day of February, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury rendered by direction of the court, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 14th day of February, 1913, denying the defendants’ motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

McLaughlin, J.:

Action to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract dated April 16, 1906, by which the Bankers’ Land and Mortgage Corporation agreed to convey certain real estate to the plaintiff and her husband, Jacob Tanzer.

The complaint alleged a breach of the contract in that the corporation fraudulently and in bad faith conveyed- the property to J. Parker Sloane and Louise M. Higham. The defense was that this conveyance was not made in repudiation of the contract with plaintiff and her husband, but with full recognition of their rights thereunder, and that Mr. Sloane and Mrs.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dresel v. JordanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Beddoe's v. WadsworthNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  3. Joyce v. ShaferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Beecher v. . ConradtNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  5. Hawley v. . KeelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bank of New York v. KennedyNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Hinman v. Hinman, New York County Courts1933
  3. Whitney v. CrouchNew York Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Egert v. Amsterdam Development & Sales Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1933
  5. Ward v. JamesOregon Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API