Ferguson v. McNab
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
Respondent candidate having two residences may choose one to which she has legitimate, significant and continuing attachments as her residence for purposes of the Election Law. (Matter of Gallagher v Dinkins, 32 NY2d 839; Election Law, § 1-104, subd 22.) We find that the determination of the Appellate Division more nearly comports with the evidence that respondent Lorraine A. Santoianni has chosen her Huntington address.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- MATTER OF GALLAGHER v. DinkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
3Cited by26 opinions
- People v. O'HARANew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- MATTER OF HOSLEY v. CurryNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Stewart v. Chautauqua County Board of ElectionsNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Isabella v. HotalingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Williams v. Rensselaer County Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.