Legal Opinion

People v. Sanders

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 2, 1983No. 4—82—0645 through 4—82—0647 consPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trapp

Defendant’s sole issue on appeal is whether time spent in jail under a commitment for civil contempt should be credited against his sentences for residential burglary (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 38, par. 19 — 3) and forgery (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 38, pars. 17 — 3(a)(1), (2)).

On October 5, 1982, defendant pleaded guilty to residential burglary and two counts of forgery. Pursuant to a plea agreement in the consolidated cases, he received concurrent seven-year terms for each offense and his probation in another case was terminated. After accepting the pleas of guilty, the trial court awarded…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the Application of the United States Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. Appeal of William CammisanoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  2. People v. LangeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. HiggersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  2. People v. HutchcraftAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Mitchell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  4. People v. OttenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. State v. DavenportCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API