Legal Opinion

Thornhill v. Houston General Lloyds

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 16, 1991No. 2-90-117-CVPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAY, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in which the trial court held that Houston General Lloyds (hereinafter Houston), insurer and appellee, had no duty to defend a suit instituted against James Thornhill (hereinafter Thornhill) and Thorn-hill Enterprises, Inc. (hereinafter Thornhill, Inc.), insureds and appellants (hereinafter Thornhill defendants). In this case of first impression, we must determine whether the allegations which form the basis of a separate pending litigation govern a disputed issue of coverage between an insurer and the defendant of that pending…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Continental Casing Corp. v. Samedan Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston v. Big Train Carpet of El Campo, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Stewart v. United States Leasing Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
  4. Martin v. PettaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Peek v. Oshman's Sporting Goods, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Utica National Insurance Co. of Texas v. American Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. King v. Dallas Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. New York Life Insurance v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. Western Heritage Ins. Co. v. River EntertainmentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  5. Snug Harbor, Ltd. v. Zurich InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API