Thornhill v. Houston General Lloyds
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAY, Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment in which the trial court held that Houston General Lloyds (hereinafter Houston), insurer and appellee, had no duty to defend a suit instituted against James Thornhill (hereinafter Thornhill) and Thorn-hill Enterprises, Inc. (hereinafter Thornhill, Inc.), insureds and appellants (hereinafter Thornhill defendants). In this case of first impression, we must determine whether the allegations which form the basis of a separate pending litigation govern a disputed issue of coverage between an insurer and the defendant of that pending…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Continental Casing Corp. v. Samedan Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston v. Big Train Carpet of El Campo, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
- Stewart v. United States Leasing Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
- Martin v. PettaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Peek v. Oshman's Sporting Goods, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Utica National Insurance Co. of Texas v. American Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
- King v. Dallas Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- New York Life Insurance v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Western Heritage Ins. Co. v. River EntertainmentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Snug Harbor, Ltd. v. Zurich InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.