Legal Opinion

Morris v. Buchanan

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1942No. 27,731PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichman, J.

This appeal involves land in Lake County which was mortgaged to secure a series of bonds. The owner conveyed subject to the mortgage. There was no agreement by the grantees John and Franciska Milevsky to pay the mortgage. After an appeal (see Metelmann v. Buchanan [1935], 101 Ind. App. 150, 198 N. E. 460) a decree was entered in the Porter Superior Court foreclosing the mortgage and establishing the priority of two bonds which matured earlier than the others. The amounts found due, exclusive of costs, were to Fannie Metelmann, $1,468.50, declared to be a first lien, and to appellees herein…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kunkel v. Laporte Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Hervey v. KrostIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. McAfee v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Brown v. Doak Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Great American Tea Co. v. Van BurenIndiana Supreme Court · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. J.S. Sweet Company, Incorporated v. Sika Chemical Corporation, Also Known as Sika CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  2. Porter v. Irvin's Interestate Brick & Block, Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Dickison v. HargittIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Porter Memorial Hospital v. MalakIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Button v. Pennsylvania RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API