Legal Opinion

Forrest v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1949PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStoddabt, J.

Motion and cross motion for summary judgment in an action to recover upon a policy of life insurance.

The plaintiffs are the beneficiaries under a policy procured by James T. Forrest, deceased, who was the father and the husband of the plaintiffs respectively. The face amount of the policy was $20,000. The insured applied for the policy on January 18, 1947, and thereafter received a policy, and paid the first premium. Another premium was paid prior to the insured’s death on November 23, 1947. Although due notice and proof of death was given, the defendant refused to pay the face amount of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Yesler v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Anderson v. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.California Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Stringham v. Mutual Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Horwitz v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  5. Homestead Fire Insurance v. IsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matthews v. Jeremiah Burns, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Byram v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1959
  3. Rosner v. Metropolitan Property And Liability Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  4. Mendel v. United States Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Dobrowolski v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API