Legal Opinion

Grandin v. La Bar

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1893Published

Appeal from District Court, Traill County; McConnell, J. Action by John L. Grandin and William J. Grandin against E. G. La Bar to quiet title to land, and for an injunction. Plaintiffs had judgment, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion

ON REHEARING.

A rehearing was ordered in this case on the petition of respondents, and the case has been again fully argued. It is first urged upon us that the evidence offered by the defendant in the court below to show that a contest between defendant and plaintiffs’ grantor, concerning this same land, was pending in the interior department, *457was properly excluded. We did not recite that evidence in the original opinion, and will here state that plaintiffs have been permitted to introduce in evidence an authenticated copy of an opinion rendered in that contest by the secretary of the interior…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Central Railroad v. Price CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Buttz v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. United States v. Burlington & Missouri River R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. United States v. Colton Marble & Lime Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API