Legal Opinion

Gellatly Fruit Co. v. Rothstein

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 1923No. Appeal, 234PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

The plaintiff company brought this action to recover the price of a carload of apples sold through its agent, Robert E. Lott a fruit broker, to the defendants. The purchase and receipt of the apples was not denied by the defendants, but they allege that they dealt with Lott as principal and owner, had no knowledge that he was acting as plaintiff’s agent, and asserted the right to set off a claim which they had against Lott, arising out of. earlier transactions in answer to the demand of the plaintiff company. It is well settled that if one deal bona fide with an agent, as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. Frame v. William Penn Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Squire v. Merchants' Warehouse Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API