Commonwealth v. Romberger
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Nix,
This is a direct appeal from a conviction for first degree murder and a sentence of death imposed in accordance with the verdict of the jury. Appellant challenges the admissibility of statements made by him to investigating officers, allegedly taken without a previous warning of his right if indigent to the presence of counsel free of charge during the interrogation, as required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). We agree and reverse the conviction.
The record shows that on November 4, 1965, the Harrisburg City Police received a missing person report…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Commonwealth v. SimalaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Commonwealth v. MarabelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. MeyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. O'SheaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. HubbleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. PetersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.