State ex rel. Leonard v. Searle
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Order issued by the supreme court requiring respondent, as judge of the district court for the Seventh judicial district, to show cause why a peremptory writ of mandamus should not issue, requiring him to settle and allow a case.
1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.
The mandate of this court is sought to compel the judge of the Seventh judicial district to settle and allow a proposed case in an action which had been previously tried before that court.
The trial court refused to allow and settle the case upon the ground that the same was not presented in proper time, which re*468quest was refused as a matter of strict legal right. The decision of the trial court was dated June 27 of the present year, and was filed two days thereafter. In addition to such decision, the following order was entered: “Stay of proceedings herein is hereby granted until September 1,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ashton v. SlaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Countryman v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Tweto v. HortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- State v. Independent School District No. 31Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Schmit v. Village of Cold SpringSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943