Goodrich v. Hicks
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Anderson. Tried below before Hon. J. G. Russell.
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Associate Justice.
This was an action by appellant to recover a lot of ground in Palestine, wherein the pleadings on either side set forth the titles relied on by the parties respectively, as they will appear below.
The case was tried by the judge, who filed conclusions of law and fact upon which this appeal is submitted without a statement of facts. Judgment having been rendered for defendants, plaintiff appeals. The facts found by the trial judge are these:
On the 29th day of April, 1893, E. Cossette, then the owner of the lot in controversy, conveyed it by deed to Maud Campbell. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Neyland v. BendyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Eastham v. RoundtreeTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- King v. GillelandTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Adoue & Lobit v. H. Seeligson & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1881
- Cook v. SparksTexas Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by10 opinions
- Blumenthal v. NussbaumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Pease v. State Ex Rel. SutherlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Burns v. Veritas Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Frank v. GaffneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Hambleton v. Southwest Texas Baptist HospitalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.