Legal Opinion
United States v. One Airplane
District Court, S.D. California
Decided December 23, 1927No. 2697-MPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
McCORMICK, District Judge.
In my opinion under the evidence in this matter, which is a libel brought by the government for 'the purpose of forfeiting an airplane under the provisions of the Acts of May 22, 1918 (22 USCA §§ 223-226), and March 2, 1921 (22 USCA § 227), the proceeding must be dismissed.
It would appear that all 'penal provisions, which include those concerning forfeiture of vehicles in the War-Time Passport Act of May 22, 1918, have not been continued in force by the Act of March 2,1921. Flora v. Rustad, 8 F.(2d) 335 (8th C. C. A.). See, also, U. S. v. Phelps (D. C.) 14 F.(2d)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Johnson v. Keating Ex Rel. TarantinoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1926
- McFarland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
- Flora v. RustadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- United States ex rel. Johanson v. PhelpsDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1926
- Takeyo Koyama v. BurnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. ObermeierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951