Smith v. Chrysler Financial Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO LIABILITY ONLY, AND; DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
STEEH, District Judge.
Defendants Chrysler Financial Corporation (“CFC”) and Chrysler Corporation move to compel arbitration and for summary judgment. Plaintiff Karen Smith moves for partial summary judgment as to liability only. For the reasons set forth below, defendants CFC’s and Chrysler’s motion to compel arbitration will be DENIED. Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment as to…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Snow v. BE & K Construction Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2001
- Lewis v. Harper HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Fritz v. Financialedge Community Credit UnionDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- Bazzi v. MS International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- Diederichs v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.