Legal Opinion

Ferster v. Ferster

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 10, 1964No. 22250PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Justice.

The single assignment of error contained in the bill of exceptions is that the trial judge erred in holding the courts of this State are not bound under the full faith and credit clause of the United States Constitution to enforce pendente lite or interlocutory judgments of a sister State that are by their own terms subject to revision or revocation. Held:

The case sub judice is controlled adversely to the plaintiff in error by the full bench decision of Cureton v. Cureton, 132 Ga. 745 (2) (65 SE 65), which held: “A decree for alimony of a sister State, providing for future…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cureton v. CuretonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ferster v. FersterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  2. Loyd v. LoydCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. Connell v. ConnellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  4. In the Interest of D. H., a Child (Mother)Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API