Legal Opinion

Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 4, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). As will be seen from our statement of facts, on the 5th day of Miay, 1926, Dan Dewberry entered into a written contract with Paul R. Brooks for the sale of the lot in controversy. After making a small cash payment, Brooks executed a note to Dewberry for the balance of the purchase money, and was placed in possession of the property. He has actually resided on the property since the date of his purchase, and was residing there at the time a mortgage was. executed by B. V. Long and wife to the Midland Savings & Loan Company, on the 18th day of May, 1926.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. American Building & Loan Ass'n v. WarrenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  2. Thalheimer v. LockertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. Naill v. KirbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  4. Crawley v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  5. First National Bank of Paris v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walls v. HumphriesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  2. Temple v. TobiasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  3. Stewart v. First Commercial BankCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API