Camenisch v. Umpqua Bank

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 SHELA CAMENISCH, et al., Case No. 20-cv-05905-RS (AGT) 7 Plaintiffs, DISCOVERY ORDER v. 8 Re: Dkt. No. 113 9 UMPQUA BANK, Defendant. 10 11 Having reviewed in camera various messages exchanged on Facebook between the named 12 plaintiffs and the proposed class members, the Court concludes, for the reasons stated below, that 13 the messages’ authors didn’t have “a reasonable expectation” that what they wrote would “remain 14 confidential.” Seahaus La Jolla Owners Assn. v. Superior Ct.,

224 Cal. App. 4th 754, 770

(2014). 15…