Legal Opinion

Mahmood v. Vicks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 1, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Melrose Vicks and Fazlim Hussain appeal, as limited by their notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rothenberg, J.), dated November 16, 2009, as denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury under the significant limitation of use category of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. ■ <

The defendants met their…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Beckett v. ConteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Ferraro v. Ridge Car ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Knight v. Zena & Sol Taxi, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API