Legal Opinion
Milich v. Schenley Industries, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 26, 1976PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on October 20, 1975, dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case, affirmed, without costs, and without disbursements. The record is crystal clear that the plaintiff has brought this action because he is not satisfied with the amount awarded to him by the awards committee. He believes he is entitled to more. That is the particular reason for this litigation. In connection with this claim it is well to quote a clause which appeared in the contest pamphlet. This clause reads as follows: "These conditions necessarily contain some…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kirke La Shelle Co. v. Paul Armstrong Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Underhill v. . SchenckNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Downey v. General Foods Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Robbins v. Frank Cooper AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- Downey v. General Foods Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
3Cited by5 opinions
- Daley v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Lisec v. United Air Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Didley v. General Motors Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1993
- Milich v. Schenley Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Whitton v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994