Legal Opinion

C.M. v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Michael D. Stallman, J.

These motions for summary judgment require the court to examine whether a school may be held responsible in tort to a student for an employee’s off-campus intentional conduct.

Background

This casé arises from an August 12, 2000 sexual encounter between the then 15-year-old plaintiff and defendant Barsky. Barsky had been plaintiffs social studies teacher at a New York City public school during the preceding school year. Although Barsky and plaintiff met frequently in school outside of class, there is no evidence of any inappropriate contact prior to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sheila C. v. PovichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Mary KK. v. Jack LL.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Doe v. WhitneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Dia CC. v. Ithaca City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. Logan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. A.B. v. StaropoliDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. John Doe v. Poly Prep Country Day SchoolDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API