Legal Opinion

Balcus v. Lexington Shoe Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 28, 1945No. 3537PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

There was evidence from which the following facts might be found. The defendant Lexington Shoe Company, having decided to move its factory from its old location on Silver Street in Manchester to a new location in the Amoskeag yard, made an arrangement with the Sterling Express Company by which the Sterling Express Company agreed to move all the machinery from the old location to the new at a fixed price of $175. In pursuance of this agreement the Sterling Express Company provided a truck and an experienced driver. It was understood that the employees of the Lexington Shoe Company were to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Danforth v. FisherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. R.A. Civitello Co. v. City of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  2. Alfred Wilson v. Nooter Corporation, and Third-Party v. The H. K. Ferguson Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
  3. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. CannonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API