Calhoon v. City of South Lake Tahoe
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | Wayne S. Calhoon, No. 2:19-cev-02165-KJM-JDP 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. City of South Lake Tahoe Police Dep’t, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 In this civil rights action, plaintiff Wayne S. Calhoon seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 | The City of South Lake Tahoe and individual police officers (collectively “city defendants”)! 19 | move under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), arguing the court should dismiss Calhoon’s 20 | untimely filing of his fourth amended complaint. They also argue under…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Alphonso Thompson v. The Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, a Public CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- McDade v. WestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Dahl v. City of Huntington BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Warren Iopa v. Saltchuk-Young Brothers, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.