Altmeyer v. Caulfield
West Virginia Supreme Court
cited Code, c. 106, s. 1; 18 Gratt. 854; Dr. Att. (6th Ed.) 106a; Dan. Att. §§ 11, 12, 33 ; 21 W. Va. 213; 10 W. Va. 136 ; 25 W. Va. 590, 601; Dr. Att. (7th Ed.) §§ 95, 96; .28 Kan. 822; 2 Wall. 581, 588; 37 Wis. 344; 2'9 W. Va. 779 ; 5 W. Va. 25; 3 .Munf. 176; 10 Gratt; 292; 6 Munf. 176; Dr. Att. § 27a.
Read the full summary
cited Code, c. 106, s. 1; 18 Gratt. 854; Dr. Att. (6th Ed.) 106a; Dan. Att. §§ 11, 12, 33 ; 21 W. Va. 213; 10 W. Va. 136 ; 25 W. Va. 590, 601; Dr. Att. (7th Ed.) §§ 95, 96; .28 Kan. 822; 2 Wall. 581, 588; 37 Wis. 344; 2'9 W. Va. 779 ; 5 W. Va. 25; 3 .Munf. 176; 10 Gratt; 292; 6 Munf. 176; Dr. Att. § 27a. I. — Appellees had a right to make the motion to quash the attachment. — 10 W. Va. 135 ; Code, c. 106, ss. 23, 19; 4 W. Va. 130; 2 II. & M. 312; 7 Leigh 314; 14 W. Va. 298; 17 Mich. 511. II. — Affidavit for attachment should have stated that the plaintiff’s claims ivere recoverable in the…
1Dissent
Dent, Judge,
{dissenting):
Peter J. Altmeyer brought suit in equity against Thomas A. Caulfield in the Circuit Court of Ohio county on the 21st day of October, 1891, and on the same day filed his affidavit in such suit and sued out an attachment. The affidavit is as follows, to wit:
“Peter J. Altmeyer makes oath and says that he is justly entitled to recover from Thomas A. Caulfield the sum of four hundred dollars with interest thereon from the 20th day of October, A. D. 1891, for money borrowed by the said Thomas A. Caulfield from the German Bank of Wheeling upon a negotiable note, u.pon which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Capehart's Ex'r v. DoweryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
- Kennedy v. MorrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1868
- Sandheger v. HoseyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
- Gutman v. Virginia Iron Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1871
- Ruhl, Koblegard & Co. v. RogersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.