Mandelbaum v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
*511 ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
STONE, Judge.
Contrary to his prior assertion in this appeal that Sirmons v. State, 634 So.2d 153 (Fla.1994), represented a departure from existing law, Appellant now argues by this motion for rehearing that Sirmons was actually a re-affirmation by the supreme court of existing law. Having reviewed the Sirmons decision and the cases cited therein, we grant Appellant’s motion for rehearing and republish our opinion as follows:
This is an appeal from the denial of post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Appellant claims both a double…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Novaton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Sirmons v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Lippman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Melvin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Sirmons v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
3Cited by1 opinion
- Farrar v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010