Legal Opinion

Carr v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance Division

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1984No. 14332PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Justice.

This appeal is from a trial court decision to affirm the South Dakota Labor Department’s determination that an employer-employee relationship existed between appel lant Eugene Carr (Carr), a practicing chiropractor, and the people working in his clinic. The Labor Department’s initial decision subjected Carr to liability for unemployment insurance payments. We affirm.

Carr has been a practicing chiropractor for over twenty-one years. His workload requires him to hire people for general office work, i.e., typing, receptionist, preparation of patients and facilitation of therapy.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Shaw v. ShawSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Weber v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal of Hendrickson's Health Care ServiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Midland Atlas Co. v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State Ex Rel. Schreiner v. ReifSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. South Dakota Department of Revenue & RegulationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. In Re the Appeal of Hendrickson's Health Care ServiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API