Fiedler Foods, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1DissentSundby, J.
{dissenting). A statute should be construed to give effect to its leading idea. State v. *729Okray Produce Co., Inc., 132 Wis. 2d 145, 150, 389 N.W.2d 825, 827 (Ct. App. 1986). The legislature in enacting the sales tax law intended only to tax sales at retail. The department’s construction of the applicable statutes results in imposing an unfair and unintended tax on the sale of a small town business. An agency construction which is contrary to the legislative intent is per se unreasonable. We owe no deference to such a construction. See State ex rel. Staples v. DHSS, 136 Wis. 2d 487, 497, 402…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. LossmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Mansfield v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Schroedel Corp. v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Staples v. Department of Health & Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
- State v. Okray Produce Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.