Legal Opinion

Booream v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 9, 2003No. 2D01-5230PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

John Booream appeals his convictions and sentences for trafficking in methamphetamine and possession of paraphernalia. We affirm the convictions without comment. Based on Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA), review dismissed, 821 So.2d 302 (Fla.2002), and Green v. State, 839 So.2d 748 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), we reverse the minimum mandatory sentence imposed for trafficking in methamphetamine and remand for resentencing in accordance with the valid laws in effect at the time Booream committed his offense. As we did in Green, we certify conflict with Carlson v. State, 27 Fla. L. Weekly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Lecorn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. Nieves v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API