Legal Opinion

Ballow v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 31, 1900No. 2234PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was charged by indictment with theft of hogs. The first count charged the theft of eight hogs, alleging possession to be in M. W. Boger at the time of taking; the second count charged -theft of 1280 pounds of hog meat, of the value of $80, consisting of ten hogs in their uncleaned condition; the third count is similar to the first count, except it charges possession in John Hester; and the fourth count charges theft of ten dead .hogs, of the value of $80, from the possession of John Hester. Hpon the trial appellant was convicted under the first count of the indictment,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hunt v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. Britton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
  3. Commonwealth v. BeamanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1857

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HedrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  2. Gusemano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Reece v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Reese v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API