Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Vezza
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 9, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Gerard Vezza and Diane Vezza appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hubsher, J.), dated September 14, 2004, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
In support of their motion for summary judgment, the *679defendants Gerard Vezza and Dianne Vezza failed to meet their prima facie burden of establishing entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986];…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Hartung v. LindsleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chernin v. New York City Metropolitan Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008