Legal Opinion

State v. Bowman

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 1984No. 15102PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon a guilty plea, John Bowman was convicted of grand theft and sentenced to an indeterminate three-year term. On appeal he argues that the sentence was excessive, and he asks us tc> “review the overall record to determine if the appropriate standard for the acceptance of a guilty plea was followed.” We affirm the judgment of conviction and the sentence.

The question concerning Bowman’s guilty plea is raised for the first time on appeal. The record shows no attempt to withdraw, or to seek relief from, the plea below. Moreover, the question is raised without identifying any particular error in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. State v. SmootIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. CrawfordIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. State v. SalinasIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MarksIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. State v. BowmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. State v. HathawayIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State v. StatenIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API