Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Brunner

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 16, 1988No. 87-258PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

This quiet title action arose from a land ownership dispute. The chancellor decided that neither party had presented sufficient evidence to establish either record title or title by adverse possession to the tract of land in question. He quieted title in the parties equally as tenants in common, “based on the uncertainty of the record title and possession.” We hold that there was evidence before the court from which record title to the tract in question could have been determined. Once it was decided that neither party had established title by adverse possession, it was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carmack v. LovettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
  2. Henslee v. KennedySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  3. Long v. Charles T. Abeles & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  4. Potter v. EasleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  5. Wilborn v. ElstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Norman v. NormanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Magnolia School District No. 14 v. Arkansas State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Gipson v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Killam v. Texas Oil & Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Schuh v. RobersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API