Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Bennett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Replevin. Defendant brings error. The-facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Champlin, 0.- J.

This was an action of replevin commenced in justice’s court to try the title of the plaintiff to a span of horses.

The defendant justified his right to possession under a, certain chattel mortgage executed by Alfred Davidson and his wife, the plaintiff, • to the Groton Bridge & Manufacturing Company, dated August 20, 1888, to secure the payment of $170, November 1, 1888, with interest. The-plaintiff was not named in the body of the instrument as-a party thereto, but signed her name to it under the name of her husband. She claimed and gave testimony which tended to prove that…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Newell v. McMurrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API