Legal Opinion

Glass v. Berryhill

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 14, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2019-1804Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LEIGH GLASS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 19-cv-1804-RCL ANDREW M. SAUL, 1 Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Leigh Glass brings this action prose challenging a Social Security Administration determination that she is ineligible for supplemental security income because she is not disabled under the Social Security Act,

42 U.S.C. § 401

et seq. Before the Court are plaintiffs Motion to Stay, ECF No. 88, and defendant Andrew M. Saul's Motion for Judgment of Affirmance, 2 ECF No. 86. After considering the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API