Legal Opinion

M. J. Moore v. Clyde Eckols

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 2, 1941No. 10934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The case is one of fact which the trial judge resolved against appellant, upon-what is deemed sufficient evidence. No good purpose can be served by filing a written opinion, and under the now settled rule none will be filed. Page v. Hart, Tex.Civ.App., 124 S.W.2d 399; Tucker v. Higdon, Tex.Civ.App., 115 S.W.2d 973, and authorities there cited; Texas & N. O. Ry. v. Futch, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040.

Affirmed.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. FutchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Tucker v. HigdonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Page v. HartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Western Life Ins. Co. v. AlcornCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. Johnson v. MirelesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941